A time to kill

In this moving-picture show barbarous law is displayed. The Jury selection process was that there were many possible Jurors, and the two lawyers picked who got to be on the Jury during the trail, 6 choice for each lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on stereotypical stereotypes such as fair will always olfactory modality that black is shamefaced, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted.I feel as though this is fair In the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its non fair that they ar choosing batch that they know what theyre final verdict will be. In todays rules of order there Is defiantly pipe down almost tension when It comes to race, and I feel as though those opinions and beliefs comes from the old fashion ways of view passed on from one generation to the next. This movie does non change my opinion on the fact that I strongly moot the law should be upheld whether the someone is black or dust coat.I do believe that the whit e custody would vex been found felonious in that day, especially with a confession on paper, I do similarly believe that these men knew exactly what they were doing which makes their crime that much worse ( Mess Rear), I overly strongly believe that no matter the situation if the errors committed a crime as evil as rape whether they were in the right mind or not should be dedicate away.The stipulation Cactus Reuse is basically saying guilty mind, and that a person must be turn out guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and with this movie the men were defiantly guilty, and with enough evidence and more than to be put away for a long age, if not then for tone. If I was Carl Lee I would guard done what he did and more.I dont count on dying is the worst affair that could happen to someone, I would feel as though them being tutored is beyond Justified and although some may argue hat life in prison would be worse than death I do not agree. How is it fair that a person commits a crime that will alter their victims life for the worst, and effect them their whole life, and be aloud to have live in a room, with a bed and food and clothes on their back. I believe they died too easily for the crime they committed.In my opinion I completely agree with the verdict of not guilty for Carl Lee, I do not think that If he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it would have make a deference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him lining guilty or not should have effected the Juries discussion, what he did he did because he needed too, and he should not feel guilty for stamp outing the scum that raped his daughter.The statute title of respect A Time to Kill related to the movie because In my opinion there Is a really small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That Is when there Is a time to kill. By Nick Starker a time to kill By nickels wanted. I feel as though this is fa ir in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what theyre IANAL verdict will be. In todays society there is defiantly still some tension when it more.I dont think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would that if he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it would have made a difference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him his daughter. The title A Time to Kill related to the movie because in my opinion there is a in truth small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That is when there is a time to kill.A time to killIn this movie criminal law is displayed. The Jury selection process was that there were many possible Jurors, and the two lawyers picked who got to be on the Jury during the trail, 6 choice for each lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on stereotypical stereotypes such as white will a lways feel that black is guilty, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted.I feel as though this is fair In the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what theyre final verdict will be. In todays society there Is defiantly still some tension when It comes to race, and I feel as though those opinions and beliefs comes from the old fashion ways of thinking passed on from one generation to the next. This movie does not change my opinion on the fact that I strongly believe the law should be upheld whether the person is black or white.I do believe that the white men would have been found guilty in that day, especially with a confession on paper, I do also believe that these men knew exactly what they were doing which makes their crime that much worse ( Mess Rear), I also strongly believe that no matter the situation if the errors committed a crime as cruel as rape whether they were in the right mind or not should be put away.The term Cactus Reuse is basically saying guilty mind, and that a person must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and with this movie the men were defiantly guilty, and with enough evidence and more to be put away for a long time, if not then for life. If I was Carl Lee I would have done what he did and more.I dont think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would feel as though them being tutored is beyond Justified and although some may argue hat life in prison would be worse than death I do not agree. How is it fair that a person commits a crime that will alter their victims life for the worst, and effect them their whole life, and be aloud to have live in a room, with a bed and food and clothes on their back. I believe they died too easily for the crime they committed.In my opinion I completely agree with the verdict of not guilty for Carl Lee, I do not think that If he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it woul d have made a deference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him lining guilty or not should have effected the Juries discussion, what he did he did because he needed too, and he should not feel guilty for killing the scum that raped his daughter.The title A Time to Kill related to the movie because In my opinion there Is a very small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That Is when there Is a time to kill. By Nick Starker a time to kill By nickels wanted. I feel as though this is fair in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what theyre IANAL verdict will be. In todays society there is defiantly still some tension when it more.I dont think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would that if he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it would have made a difference, what he did was Justifiable and I a gree with it, I also do not think that him his daughter. The title A Time to Kill related to the movie because in my opinion there is a very small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That is when there is a time to kill.