Causes of Political Disaffection and Disengagement

Causes of semipolitical Disaffection and Dis meshmentIs the British policy-making syndicate to blame for governmental alienation and disengagement?The Founding Fathers suggested that a state can only come to transp argonnt decisions if two(prenominal) senior mellow school levels of representation and deliberation take place (Gargargonlla, 1998). As a moderate of growing semi semi semi semi semi governmental disengagement and alienation indoors contemporary British politics, thither is a growing, focus on the whole tone of representative democracy in Britain and on the quality of participatory democracy (Kelso, 2007, p365) the relationship that has been treasure is that political e grotesquement and disengagement ar not conducive with an impartial democracy. Worryingly, both the Hansard Societys annual, Audit of governmental Engagement (2017), and a recent firm of Commons briefing paper, semipolitical disengagement in the UK who is disengaged? (2017), suggest that political disaffection and disengagement are growing loves acquaintance of politics is down six percent from the previous year (49%), the level of trust in Government to put the needs of the nation offshoot has dropped to 17% (2013) and trust in the credibility of mononuclear phagocyte system stands at a measly 9%. These figures indicate that there is indeed an issue of disaffection and disengagement within the UK, thus, to determine if the political class or instead, something else is responsible, it becomes needed to investigate what the cause of disengagement and disaffection is within specific subsections of the universe of discourse especially those who are more likely to become disengaged from politics the disaffect democrats (Flinders, 2015). These factions include demographics such as the work class and 18-24 year olds, both of which account for low levels of knowledge in politics compared to the average menti unitaryd to a higher place 29% and 33% respectively (H ansard Society 2017). The term political class is contentious and, isstill not thoroughly developed in literature (Manolov 2013). Allen &Cairneys, What do we mean when we talkabout the Political distinguish? (2015),offers the trump out practical definition that the term political class is usedto come in indisputable, flawed characteristics, that elected politicians tend tohold, those beingLimited roots in local constituencies, inexperience of the real world, inability to reect the genial background of the right to vote population, inability to represent devolved and English regions, and their tendency to engage in a style of politics that is off-putting to the usual public.(Allen & Cairney, 2015, p18) The general view that the work class accreditedly haveof politicians is one of cynicism (Manning & Homes 2012). inside a studyconducted by Manning & Holmes (2012), members of the working class gaveopinions on how the political class cannot represent them one member of thesur vey describing David Cameron, the then PM as followed hes snooty hellnot really be interested in ordinary, what I class ordinary people (Manning& Holmes, 2012, p.483). This breeze of narrative makes total smell as thereis no smell of descriptive representation (Pitkin, 1967) for nearly electedMPs. For example, just 3% of MPs elected in 2015 came from an occupationalbackground described as manual(a) work (House of Commons Library 2016), whilstthe proportion of the population that lies within the kind class of manualworkers (DE) stands at 25% (NRS, 2016). Moreover, the annual wage for theworking class sits below 20,000 (Manning & Holmes, 2012) whilst the baseannual salary of an MP starts at 76,011 (Parliament.uk, 2017). It would be fairto say that there is a huge socio-economic discrepancy between the two classeswhich makes it hard for the working class to believe that they are trulyrepresented within Parliament. This idea has been explored thoroughly in interpretto the descri ptive representation of women Phillips (1995), most notably suggestedthat the electorate tends to favour those that are, best supply to represent(Wngerud, 2009, p.52), their views those that can empathise directly withtheir electorate. Underrepresentation is an issue for a practically wider demographicthan just the working class. Just 8% of MPs learn as BME (British Future,2017) whilst the population of BME citizens in the UK stands at 13% (Census,2011). Furthermore, just 2% of MPs are under the age of 30 (Total Politics,2016) whereas those who are of voting age under 30 make up 8.4% (Census, 2011).As the political class is not representative of the working class, or if itfails to represent minorities proportionally, there is no sense of,impartiality, within the representative process (Gargarella, 1998), resultingin political disaffection and potentially take down disengagement. Whilst Pinkleton & Austin (2004) suggest that political disaffection leads to political disengagemen t, in evaluation, there is evidence to suggest that although disaffection is significant within the UK, the same cannot be said for political disengagement. Flinders (2015) argues that the current political climate is not, anti-political that is it is not in favour of disengaging from politics further that it is, anti-establishment disaffected from contemporary politics and the disposition of the institution of the political class. Whilst statistics antecedently mentioned indicate that the levels of political knowledge within the working class are relatively low (29% vs. mixer class AB returning 71%), voter turnout in the 2017 General choice is only slenderly lower than the highest ranking amicable class DEs 61% in comparison to ABs 73% (IPSOS Mori, 2017). This would then indicate that even though the working class feels disaffection towards politics, they remain involved in the political process. This seems to be the case more generally more and more people are involving t hemselves in politics. Party membership numbers are ever increasing with the Labour party holding a 38 year high of 552,000 members (June 2017) and the Liberal Democrats a 24 year high of 102,000 (June 2017) (House of Commons Library, 2018). The logical question therefore why is this the case amongst the working class and society in general?Birch (2016) reiterates the assumption that the remobilisation of certain cleavages within politics indicates that a, newissue has galvanised a previously political quiescent sector of the population(p.107). This is reflected in the 2015 YouGov analysis of the General Electionin which, the info within the genial class DE shows a fight away from theConservatives (a vote share of 29%, their lowest amongst whatever social class) andone towards the alternatives of Labour and UKIP (37% and 18% respectively). Avote for Labour, whilst not as obviously as a vote for UKIP, could still very rise be a vote against the political class. Mills (1958) speci fication of thepolitical class as the, political directorate, places greater influence onthe role of Cabinet above both Government and naturally Parliament. pursuitMills terminology, a vote against the, political directorate, would be allparty that would topple the current Cabinet. Thus, as Labour offer the mostimmediate alternative to the, political directorate, in a UK that is converge upon a two-party system (Prosser, 2018), a vote for them could alsobe interpreted as a rejection of the current political class produce ofpolitical disaffection but not of disengagement.A stronger argument for disaffection being the faultof the political class would be the rise in support for UKIP. Nigel Farage,former leader and ardent supporter of UKIP, ran on a campaign revolving aroundthe political class, selling us out, payable to them being, career politicians(GE 2015 & Brexit referendum 2017), drawing a clear line between the electorateand, them, (the political class). As well as furtherin g the argument of alack of descriptive representation causing political disaffection, Faragescampaign platform highlights an issue Crouch outlined in Post-Democracy (2004) career politicians are, more concerned with face-off the needs of big business rather than ordinary citizens (Jennings etal., 2016, p.880). This concept is strengthened by a survey carried out by Jenningset al, which reports that 78% of social classes C2DE believe politicians to beself-serving. This in tandem with the rise in votes for other parties, givesevidence of a growing cleavage against the political class, which although has preventedpolitical disengagement from becoming a widespread issue amongst the workingclass, has cemented political disaffection within society.However, in evaluation, whilst political disaffectionis self-evident, there is a systemic issue which enables the political class tounjustly receive some(prenominal) of the criticism. Flinders (2014, p.3) draws attention tothe 1975 report, The Crisis of Democracy,which suggests that, the demands on egalitarian government grow, while thecapacity of democratic government stagnates. The concept Flinders thenexplores in the same term is one of an, expectation gap, and, in another article,joined by Kelso, he goes on to assert that the contemporary system ofGovernment, encourages politicians to promise standards of behaviour thatare unrealistic and unattainable (2011). Thus, when these, unattainable, promisesare not kept, the result is one of disaffection as the electorate feels letdown. Looking through the lens of granulose theory, it becomes clear as to why thisis a systemic issue within contemporary UK politics. Whilst competingpoliticians both offer the most out of reach promises, any attempt to reducethe expectation gap by lowering the quality of promises will yield less votes,as to the electorate, the other candidates yields them a break down payoff. Thus,the current scenario remains in a Nash equilibrium in which b oth candidateswill offer a high level of promises in wrong to the expectation gap. Whilstit could be argued that the political class is at fault for crackunreasonable promises in the first places, it is to an extent only as a resultof the nature of the contemporary electoral system. It can also be argued that political disaffection and disengagement are both contributed to by orthogonal factors, as opposed to just the political class. One of those external factors would be the influence of social media. Whilst this applies more to the younger generations within the electorate, the effects of social media in creating political disaffection are considerate. Yanamoto et al. (2017) report of ever increasing, bang advertising, and, negative media coverage, which perhaps foreshadowed the investigation into the activities of Cambridge Analytica (Channel 4 News, 2018). CA was more notoriously active in the Trump presidential choice yet compete a part in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Alt hough there has been no leak of the explicit role CA played in the Brexit campaign, handout off track record of its campaign defining crooked Hilary motto it developed from US Facebook data, it would be fair to suggest that the firm played a part in inflating political disaffection felt by the UK electorate. Even if CA was not directly involved, it cannot be denied that websites such as twitter, facebook and YouTube give individuals and entities a platform to spread cynicism and a rhetoric in favour of political disaffection. As suggested in Flinders (2015) individuals such as Owen Jones and Russel instigant played, major roles, in promoting a, different form of politics, engaging their audience, generally the youth, in a narrative which revolved around the idea that, the nature of British democracy was one of failure. Yanamoto et al (2017) found that cynicism like this, did not yield in disengagement from politics but rather, it, fostered, a sense of desire to create change. In evaluation, social media is only a office of venting and publicising the original disaffection held by the electorate disaffection which has been created by the political class.BibliographyAllen, P. & Cairney,P., 2015. What do we mean when we talk about the political class?. Political Studies Review, 2017,Vol.15(1), pp.18-27. acquirable from http//journals.sagepub.com/inside/pdf/10.1111/1478-9302.12092Birch, S., (2016). Ournew voters Brexit, political mobilisation and the emerging electoral cleavage.Juncture, 2016, Vol.23 (2), p.107-111. functional from http//web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=1b6a5f7d-88e1-4a87-93c5-b91d1acc55b3%40sessionmgr102&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3dAN=118114895&db=bthBritish Future. 52 minority MPs to sit in most diverse UKparliament ever. capital of the United KingdomBritish Future. open from http//www.britishfuture.org/articles/52-minority-mps-to-sit-in-most-diverse-uk-parliament-ever/Channel 4 News., 2018. Exposed undercover secr ets of Trumps datafirm. London Channel 4. open from https//www.channel4.com/news/exposed-undercover-secrets-of-donald-trump-data-firm-cambridge-analyticaCrouch, C., 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge PolityCrozier, M., Huntington,S. P., Watanuki, J., trigon Commission., 1975. The crisis of democracy Report on the governability of democracies tothe trilateral commission. New York New York University struggleFarage, N., (2017). I got into politics because I could see ourpolitical class in Westminster would sell us out to Europe. operational fromhttps//www.facebook.com/nigelfarageofficial/videos/1542379039143027/Flinders, M., 2014. ExplainingDemocratic Disaffection closedown the Expectations Gap. Governance, Vol.27(1), pp.1-8. Available from https//bath.userservices.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2335930000002761&institutionId=2761&customerId=2760Flinders, M., 2015. TheGeneral Rejection? Political withdrawal, Disaffected Democ rats and DoingPolitics Differently. ParliamentaryAffairs, 2015, Vol. 68(suppl1), pp.241-254. Available from https//academic.oup.com/pa/article/68/suppl_1/241/1403570Flinders, M. and Kelso, A., 2011. Mindthe Gap Political Analysis, Public Expectations and the Parliamentary setThesis. The British Journal of Politicsand International Relations, Vol.13(2), pp.249-268. Available from http//journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/inside/abs/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00434.xGargarella, R. (1998).Full Representation, Deliberation and Impartiality, in J. Elster (ed.),Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, pp. 11037 Great Britain.Parliament. House of Commons, 2016. Socialbackground of MPs 1979-2017. London House of Commons Library. Availablefrom http//researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7483/CBP-7483.pdfGreat Britain.Parliament. House of Commons, 2017. Politicaldisengagement in the UK who is disengaged?. London House of CommonsLibrary. Available from ht tp//researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7501/CBP-7501.pdfGreat Britain. Parliament.House of Commons, 2018. rank of UKpolitical parties. London House of Commons Library. Available from http//researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05125/SN05125.pdfThe Hansard Society,2017. Audit of Political Engagement 14. LondonThe Hansard Society. (The 2017 Report). Available from https//www.hansardsociety.org.uk/research/audit-of-political-engagementIPSOS Mori, 2017. How Britain voted in the 2017 elections. LondonIPSOS Mori. Available from https//www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2017-06/how-britain-voted-in-the-2017-election_2.pdfJennings, W., Stoker, G.,and Twyman, J., 2016. The Dimensions and Impact of Political Discontent inBritain. Parliamentary Affairs. Vol.69(4), pp. 876-900. Available from https//academic-oup-com.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/pa/article/69/4/876/2468902Kelso, A., 2007. Parliamentand Political Disengagement Neither waving nor Drowning. The Political Quarterl y. Vol 78(3), p. 364-373. Available from https//onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00865.xManolov, G. L., 2013.The Political Class Defintion and Characteristics. Slavak Journal of Political Sciences, Vol. 13(No. 1), pp.5-23.Available from https//www.degruyter.com/view/j/sjps.2013.13.issue-1/issue-files/sjps.2013.13.issue-1.xmlMills, C. W., (1958). The Power Elite. London OxfordUniversity Press, pp. 225-42.National ReadershipSurvey, 2017. Social Grade. London Publishers Audience Measurement Company Ltd.Available from www.nrs.co.uk/nrs-print/lifestyle-and-classification-data/social-grade/Office for NationalStatistics, National Records of Scotland, Northern Ireland Statistics andResearch Agency. 2011. Census commingledata. UK Data Service. Available from http//dx.doi.org/10.5257/census/aggregate-2011-1Pinkleton, B. E. & Austin, E. W., 2004. Mediaperceptions and public affairs stolidity in the politically inexperienced. Mass Communication & Society, Vol.7(3),319337. Available from https//www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_4?needAccess=truePitkin, H., 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley,CA. University of California PressPhillips, A., 1995. The Politics of Presence. OxfordClarendon PressProsser, C., 2018. Thestrange death of multi-party Britain the UK General Election of 2017. West European Politics. 26 January 2018,p.1-11. Available from https//www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1080/01402382.2018.1424838?needAccess=trueWngerud, L., 2009. Womenin Parliaments Descriptive and Substantive Representation. The annual Review of Political Science. Vol.12(1),pp.51-69. Available from https//www-annualreviews-org.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/doi/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839Whale, S., 2016. Theunder-30 club Life in the Commons for Britains youngest MPs. Total Politics. London Total Politics. Availablefrom https//www.totalpolitics.com/articles/features/under-30-clu b-life-commons-britains-youngest-mps