Privacy Issues in Social Networking and Social Media

silence Issues in amic up to(p) Networking and complaisant MediaSophie MuthenPrivacy is becoming increasingly irrelevant in the context of neighborly networking sites and tender media. Discuss.Nowadays overlap individual(prenominal) instruction on kind networking sites (SNS) has fabricate a affable norm, affairrs pure tone agree adequate to(p) almost(predicate) sharing their private life online tho the issues of privacy online still remains. Martin Zuckerberg stated himself in 2010 that users of SNS engender in a flash become more open, sharing more and more personal reading online and with a greater total of people. This may guide become a social norm in our modern times but users should keep in mind that those information can be used in harmful ways such as for personal identity theft or stalking. Therefore a brace should be kept amongst online disclosure and privacy as tipping the scales may be harmful to the users. Users of SNS should take into consid eration what kindhearted of information they sh ar online and to whom it should be divulged to. This is why users of social networking sites should develop technical skills to protect their privacy online. This prove will explore the different privacy issues people may present on SNS and how a balance between online disclosure and privacy should be maintained to victorfully function in both the online and offline world.A clear understanding of social networking sites and privacy issues online is the key to this issue. In the recent years social networking sites (SNS) pack attracted millions of people as on such sites people can broadcast in various ways. As Beye et al. (n.d) SNS allow people to create a network that represent their social ties, slowly shargon media circumscribe online, provides a communication channel and sh ar the daily aspect of their life with friends. However there are potential threats that are posed to privacy of the users, as due to SNS personal infor mation are subject to a wider audience and a good deal information about a user are posted by others without the his or her consent. Therefore social media complicates the boundaries of what personal information are rendered unrestricted.Users of SNS have become so comfortable with the sharing of personal information online that they are not aware of the dangers they face online due to privacy issues. manduction our everyday life with friends and relatives with just a few clicks is indeed nice but people often forget that digital information is persistent and can arbitrarily be copied, distributed, and repurposed (Debatin, 2011, p. 57). When creating a profile on SNS you are to provide information such as your age, name and the country where you live. These information can easily be accessed either by the public or hackers and this is what leads to identity thefts. As all your personal information are available on the site anyone can use this information to steal the identity of users. another(prenominal) problem that arises from privacy issues is stalking. Zheleva and Geetor (2009) explains that while the user may choose to comprise his profile private the companionship links and group affiliation are often visible to the public. This is how the information leaks occurs, people not in your group of friends can see the posts in which you are tagged in which is how they may be able to access your personal information level though your profile remains private. These information link may allow stalkers to follow your activities online. This may as well as happen when you befriend people online without enjoying their identity. Nowadays it has become a trend to cover your everyday activity online, for example, you could post that you are at Bagatelle shopping centre right now. This may allow stalkers to know your every move and schedule daily. The problem of stalkers can also be linked to sexual predators, who looks for younger girls on SNS and add them as friends, they then view the personal information of those girls and stalk them online. Another privacy that users can face is that the information they shared remains online even after four to five years when they have forgotten about it. Companies or the law for investigations of social background. Users should be aware of those various privacy issues and share personal information with caution on SNS. enchantment discretion should be exercised when sharing personal information online, there are various benefits to online disclosure. In existing life when forming social bonds you selectively reveal personal information, to feel closer to the person and get to know individually other. Therefore when insideng so on social networking sites (SNS) people also create social bonds with each other. They get to know each other and form friendships but in an online environment. So, SNS has given people a network where they can socialize and form social bonds with people without being li mited by outstrip or time. For example, a man from Mauritius could be able to communicate with a woman from France if he wishes to. SNS have therefore removed this barrier of distance in socialization, allowing people from all other the world to communicate with each other. Benniger (1987) describes how mass media has gradually replaced interpersonal communication as a socializing force (Barnes, 2006). SNS have also increased the number of people with who we can socialize with as due to those websites users are able to form social bonds with multiple people at the same time. SNSs have amplified the threshold to the number of social bonds any one human can have (Papacharissi Gibson, 2011, p. 82). When using SNS you share personal information about yourself, which in turn allows you to connect with people with similar interests or mind find. This allow people to feel less isolated as they are able to communicate with people which are similar to them and they are even able mobilize to address the issues that matter to them (Westlake, 2008, p. 37). The ability to connect with people through social networking sites has made us arguably more social.A balance between online disclosure and privacy is inhering for SNS to have a beneficial effect on peoples life. As Debatin (2011) explains, people fatiguet often realise the importance of privacy as the impact of disclosure is not flying whereas the benefits of SNS are tangible and felt immediately. While privacy is a basic human right hold by the UN Declaration of Human Rights, users of SNS have to insist on their privacy rights and acquire the technical skills to be able to protect their privacy online. To do so users moldiness be aware of the privacy issues they face online and develop strategies to solve this issues. Nowadays users of social networking sites can choose the level of privacy on their profile, they are able to manage their online privacy themselves and decide if certain information will be visibl e to the public or only to their friends. In order to address users privacy concerns, a number of social media and social network websites, such as Facebook, Orkut and Flickr, allow their participants to set the privacy level of their online profiles and to disclose either somewhat or none of the attributes in their profiles (Zheleva Getoor, 2009, p. 531). Users moldiness therefore learn how to manage those privacy settings to build a secure environment on SNS which will then prevent them from facing issues such as identity theft or stalking. They must make the most of the features provided by SNS to protect their privacy. Developing the appropriate skills to use social networking sites allow users to maintain the fragile balance between online disclosure and privacy. tender media has changed our mind set concerning the amount of personal information that should or should not be rendered public. In the late 1990s when the net began gaining popularity it was almost unthinkable to post your photo, location or even your real name online. With SNSs finding success in the mid 2000s, people allowed this technology to enlarge their comfort zones, as it gave them more freedom to share personal information online and therefore with time making them feel more at ease to do so. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg even goes as far as saying that privacy is no long-run a social norm (BCS, 2010). We have been changed by this new technology and while online disclosure has some(prenominal) benefits such as uniting people and creating social bonds, users must keep in mind that they must make the most social networking sites while keeping their right to privacy intact.It has been argued that a balance between privacy and online disclosure is essential when sharing information on SNSs. The dangers of not taking into consideration privacy issues were weighed up against the social benefits of disclosure. It was therefore concluded that the logical solution was for users of SNSs to understand the functioning of social sites and make the best of their privacy settings to create a safe environment online for them to communicate and share personal information with other people. The potential of SNSs to create social enhancement should be embraced but a balance must be constantly kept between privacy and online disclosure.ReferencesBarnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox Social networking in the United States.First Monday,11(9). doi10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394Bcs.org,. (2015).Zuckerberg Privacy no longer a social-norm BCS The Chartered Institute for IT. Retrieved 1 June 2015, from http//www.bcs.org/ centre/conWebDoc/34018Beye, M., Jeckmans, A., Arkins, Z., Hartel, P., Lagendijk, R., Tang, Q. Privacy in Online Social Networks, 1-3. Retrieved from http//doc.utwente.nl/81270/1/Beye12privacy.pdfBoyd, D., Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings Who cares?.First Monday,15(8). doi10.5210/fm.v15i8.3086Debatin, B. (2011). Ethics, Privacy, and Self-Restraint in Social Networking. In S. Trepte L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web (pp. 47-60). Berlin Springer-Verlag.Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern indoors social networking sites A comparison of Facebook and MySpace.Houghton, D., Joinson, A. (2010). Privacy, Social Network Sites, and Social Relations.Journal Of Technology In Human Services,28(1-2), 74-94. doi10.1080/15228831003770775Madden, M. (2012). Privacy management on social media sites.Papacharissi, Z. Gibson, P. L. (2011). Fifteen Minutes of Privacy Privacy, Sociality, and Publicity on Social Network Sites. In S. Trepte L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web (pp. 74-89). Berlin Springer-Verlag.Walther, J. B. (2011). Introduction to Privacy Online. In S. Trepte L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web (pp. 3-8). Berlin Springer- VerlagWestlake, E. (2008). Friend Me if You Facebook Generation Y and Performative Surveillance.TDR/The Drama Review,52(4), 21-40. doi10.1162/dram.2008.52.4.21Zheleva, E., Getoor, L. (2009). To Join or Not to Join The Illusion of Privacy in Social Networks with Mixed Public and Private User Profiles, 531-535. Retrieved from http//www2009.eprints.org/54/1/p531.pdfSophie Muthen18073799Essay